Religion is alive in public square?

 America is the land of opportunity and freedom, where we have the choice to believe in any religion and practice. Religion is supposed to bring people together and give us something to believe in. I also think that shouldn't "freedom of religion" include freedom from religion for those who want it? As the author argued about where Perry got his information and giving the facts and information of why people should have the right to have religious alive in public square and gathering to publish their own religious thoughts. Every state has its law for all citizens. You don't get to opt-out just because you choose to believe in fairy tales or any religious of your own. The laws governing the nation are those who created and established by local, state and federal legislatures.  To me personally, whoever practice and telling religions how to do something don’t expect anything from the state or local. People with “faith based” could still be treated equal whether they are Republican or Conservative. They would be able to use their religion as long as it’s not organized to impose the power of government or ideologies on others of different religions or no religious beliefs. As to my point of view and opinion, when Perry told the courts, secularists and leftists are trying to keep people of faith from the public arena might mean that one person’s religious freedom is another person’s unwanted religious intrusion as well. No one can deny any one who carries faith and their own beliefs when they try to sacrifice for the common good plan to compromise with opponents for the national good. All said, the author made own opinion and criticize Perry’s quotes with facts and various newspaper that posted the issue and given the gathering place where religious alive in public square legally.http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/editorials/20120925-editorial-religion-is-alive-in-public-square.ece