White House lied to us all ?

The TexasFred blogger posted an article about the Libyan attack “White House told of Libyan attack claim Sept.11” with such a strong opinion about it. The blogger gave his opinion and allowed people to decide whether to vote or not vote for Obama based on the Libyan attack that recently happened.

Fred did a good job of stating that White House, U.N council and Ambassador are all LIARS. Basically, the government claimed that they know nothing about the attack and making excuses to cover up. However, not just Fred but people now are really paying attention no matter what evidences they showed to us all.

He also pointed out believes about several issues that happened while Obama kept telling people to keep believing in him. It is somewhat related to the fight that has been happened in Libya. Mostly, he pretty much summed up how much the White House has lied to the Americans with such a vague evident. He brought up the Youtuber which is a good evident/point because it is considered as Media related to say that now; our world has more and more facilities that could help us getting the REAL information and not FAKE from the President.

Overall, I agreed that he did a good job of addressing the opinion to the article and how much the White House lied to all citizens lies and giving us the option of who to elect as President. However, I think instead of keep saying that the governments are all liars, he should’ve put a sentence or so a reference to his argument about how all are liars and already knew about the situation. In my opinion, I used this sentence as an evident for White House being a liar: “The document could fuel Republican efforts to show that the White House knew it was a terrorist attack”- it is an absolute evident which create a controversy. I believed that everyone had their own choice of choosing which political party to be with as Fred mentioned.http://www.texasfred.net/archives/18674

Religion is alive in public square?

 America is the land of opportunity and freedom, where we have the choice to believe in any religion and practice. Religion is supposed to bring people together and give us something to believe in. I also think that shouldn't "freedom of religion" include freedom from religion for those who want it? As the author argued about where Perry got his information and giving the facts and information of why people should have the right to have religious alive in public square and gathering to publish their own religious thoughts. Every state has its law for all citizens. You don't get to opt-out just because you choose to believe in fairy tales or any religious of your own. The laws governing the nation are those who created and established by local, state and federal legislatures.  To me personally, whoever practice and telling religions how to do something don’t expect anything from the state or local. People with “faith based” could still be treated equal whether they are Republican or Conservative. They would be able to use their religion as long as it’s not organized to impose the power of government or ideologies on others of different religions or no religious beliefs. As to my point of view and opinion, when Perry told the courts, secularists and leftists are trying to keep people of faith from the public arena might mean that one person’s religious freedom is another person’s unwanted religious intrusion as well. No one can deny any one who carries faith and their own beliefs when they try to sacrifice for the common good plan to compromise with opponents for the national good. All said, the author made own opinion and criticize Perry’s quotes with facts and various newspaper that posted the issue and given the gathering place where religious alive in public square legally.http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/editorials/20120925-editorial-religion-is-alive-in-public-square.ece